Randomized placebo-controlled phase II trial of high-dose melatonin mucoadhesive oral gel for the prevention and treatment of oral mucositis in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing radiation therapy concurrent with systemic treatment

Purpose The objective of this trial was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of melatonin oral gel mouthwashes in the prevention and treatment of oral mucositis (OM) in patients treated with concurrent radiation and systemic treatment for head and neck cancer. Methods Randomized, phase II, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (1:1 ratio) of 3% melatonin oral gel mouthwashes vs. placebo, during IMRT (total dose ≥ 66 Gy) plus concurrent Q3W cisplatin or cetuximab. Primary endpoint: grade 3–4 OM or Severe Oral Mucositis (SOM) incidence by RTOG, NCI, and a composite RTOG-NCI scales. Secondary endpoints: SOM duration and grade 2–4 OM or Ulcerative Oral Mucositis (UOM) incidence and duration. Results Eighty-four patients were included in the study. Concurrent systemic treatments were cisplatin (n = 54; 64%) or cetuximab (n = 30; 36%). Compared with the placebo arm, RTOG-defined SOM incidence was numerically lower in the 3% melatonin oral gel arm (53 vs. 64%, P = 0.36). In patients treated with cisplatin, assessed by the RTOG-NCI composite scale, both SOM incidence (44 vs. 78%; P = 0.02) and median SOM duration (0 vs. 22 days; P = 0.022) were significantly reduced in the melatonin arm. Median UOM duration assessed by the RTOG-NCI scale was also significantly shorter in the melatonin arm (49 vs. 73 days; P = 0.014). Rate of adverse events and overall response rate were similar between the two arms. Conclusions Treatment with melatonin oral gel showed a consistent trend to lower incidence and shorter SOM duration and shorter duration of UOM. These results warrant further investigation in phase III clinical trial (AU)

Population-based risk assessment of second primary cancers following a first head and neck cancer: patterns of association and difficulties of its analysis

Purpose The diagnosis of a second primary cancer (SPC) is a major concern in the follow-up of survivors of a primary head and neck cancer (HNC), but the anatomic subsites in the head and neck area are close, making it difficult to distinguish a SPC of a recurrence and therefore register it correctly. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study using data from two population-based cancer registries in Catalonia, Spain: the Tarragona Cancer Registry and the Girona Cancer Registry. All patients diagnosed with HNC during the period 1994–2013 were registered and followed-up to collect cases of SPC. We analysed the standardized incidence ratio (SIR) and the excess absolute risk (EAR) to determine the risk of second malignancies following a prior HNC. Results 923 SPC were found in a cohort of 5646 patients diagnosed of a first head and neck cancer. Men had an increased risk of a SPC with a SIR of 2.22 and an EAR of 216.76. Women also had an increased risk with a SIR of 2.02 and an EAR of 95.70. We show the risk for different tumour sites and discuss the difficulties of the analysis. Conclusion The risks of a SPC following a prior HNC in Tarragona and Girona are similar to those previously found in other similar cohorts. It would appear to be advisable to make a revision of the international rules of classification of multiple tumours, grouping the sites of head and neck area with new aetiological criteria to better determine and interpret the risks of SPC obtained in these studies (AU)

Randomized placebo-controlled phase II trial of high-dose melatonin mucoadhesive oral gel for the prevention and treatment of oral mucositis in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing radiation therapy concurrent with systemic treatment.

PURPOSE: The objective of this trial was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of melatonin oral gel mouthwashes in the prevention and treatment of oral mucositis (OM) in patients treated with concurrent radiation and systemic treatment for head and neck cancer. METHODS: Randomized, phase II, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (1:1 ratio) of 3% melatonin oral gel mouthwashes vs. placebo, during IMRT (total dose ≥ 66 Gy) plus concurrent Q3W cisplatin or cetuximab. Primary endpoint: grade 3-4 OM or Severe Oral Mucositis (SOM) incidence by RTOG, NCI, and a composite RTOG-NCI scales. Secondary endpoints: SOM duration and grade 2-4 OM or Ulcerative Oral Mucositis (UOM) incidence and duration. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients were included in the study. Concurrent systemic treatments were cisplatin (n = 54; 64%) or cetuximab (n = 30; 36%). Compared with the placebo arm, RTOG-defined SOM incidence was numerically lower in the 3% melatonin oral gel arm (53 vs. 64%, P = 0.36). In patients treated with cisplatin, assessed by the RTOG-NCI composite scale, both SOM incidence (44 vs. 78%; P = 0.02) and median SOM duration (0 vs. 22 days; P = 0.022) were significantly reduced in the melatonin arm. Median UOM duration assessed by the RTOG-NCI scale was also significantly shorter in the melatonin arm (49 vs. 73 days; P = 0.014). Rate of adverse events and overall response rate were similar between the two arms. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with melatonin oral gel showed a consistent trend to lower incidence and shorter SOM duration and shorter duration of UOM. These results warrant further investigation in phase III clinical trial.

Population-based risk assessment of second primary cancers following a first head and neck cancer: patterns of association and difficulties of its analysis.

PURPOSE: The diagnosis of a second primary cancer (SPC) is a major concern in the follow-up of survivors of a primary head and neck cancer (HNC), but the anatomic subsites in the head and neck area are close, making it difficult to distinguish a SPC of a recurrence and therefore register it correctly. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study using data from two population-based cancer registries in Catalonia, Spain: the Tarragona Cancer Registry and the Girona Cancer Registry. All patients diagnosed with HNC during the period 1994-2013 were registered and followed-up to collect cases of SPC. We analysed the standardized incidence ratio (SIR) and the excess absolute risk (EAR) to determine the risk of second malignancies following a prior HNC. RESULTS: 923 SPC were found in a cohort of 5646 patients diagnosed of a first head and neck cancer. Men had an increased risk of a SPC with a SIR of 2.22 and an EAR of 216.76. Women also had an increased risk with a SIR of 2.02 and an EAR of 95.70. We show the risk for different tumour sites and discuss the difficulties of the analysis. CONCLUSION: The risks of a SPC following a prior HNC in Tarragona and Girona are similar to those previously found in other similar cohorts. It would appear to be advisable to make a revision of the international rules of classification of multiple tumours, grouping the sites of head and neck area with new aetiological criteria to better determine and interpret the risks of SPC obtained in these studies.

Delay in starting radiotherapy due to neoadjuvant therapy does not worsen survival in unresected glioblastoma patients

Purpose: We retrospectively examined the potential effect on overall survival (OS) of delaying radiotherapy to administer neoadjuvant therapy in unresected glioblastoma patients. Patients and methods: We compared OS in 119 patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy followed by standard treatment (NA group) and 96 patients receiving standard treatment without neoadjuvant therapy (NoNA group). The MaxStat package of R identified the optimal cut-off point for waiting time to radiotherapy. Results: OS was similar in the NA and NoNA groups. Median waiting time to radiotherapy after surgery was 13 weeks for the NA group and 4.2 weeks for the NoNA group. The longest OS was attained by patients who started radiotherapy after 12 weeks and the shortest by patients who started radiotherapy within 4 weeks (12.3 vs 6.6 months) (P = 0.05). OS was 6.6 months for patients who started radiotherapy before the optimal cutoff of 6.43 weeks and 19.1 months for those who started after this time (P = 0.005). Patients who completed radiotherapy had longer OS than those who did not, in all 215 patients and in the NA and NoNA groups (P = 0.000). In several multivariate analyses, completing radiotherapy was a universally favorable prognostic factor, while neoadjuvant therapy was never identified as a negative prognostic factor. Conclusion: In our series of unresected patients receiving neoadjuvant treatment, in spite of the delay in starting radiotherapy, OS was not inferior to that of a similar group of patients with no delay in starting radiotherapy

No disponible

Delay in starting radiotherapy due to neoadjuvant therapy does not worsen survival in unresected glioblastoma patients.

PURPOSE: We retrospectively examined the potential effect on overall survival (OS) of delaying radiotherapy to administer neoadjuvant therapy in unresected glioblastoma patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We compared OS in 119 patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy followed by standard treatment (NA group) and 96 patients receiving standard treatment without neoadjuvant therapy (NoNA group). The MaxStat package of R identified the optimal cut-off point for waiting time to radiotherapy. RESULTS: OS was similar in the NA and NoNA groups. Median waiting time to radiotherapy after surgery was 13 weeks for the NA group and 4.2 weeks for the NoNA group. The longest OS was attained by patients who started radiotherapy after 12 weeks and the shortest by patients who started radiotherapy within 4 weeks (12.3 vs 6.6 months) (P = 0.05). OS was 6.6 months for patients who started radiotherapy before the optimal cutoff of 6.43 weeks and 19.1 months for those who started after this time (P = 0.005). Patients who completed radiotherapy had longer OS than those who did not, in all 215 patients and in the NA and NoNA groups (P = 0.000). In several multivariate analyses, completing radiotherapy was a universally favorable prognostic factor, while neoadjuvant therapy was never identified as a negative prognostic factor. CONCLUSION: In our series of unresected patients receiving neoadjuvant treatment, in spite of the delay in starting radiotherapy, OS was not inferior to that of a similar group of patients with no delay in starting radiotherapy.

Multidisciplinary management of head and neck cancer: First expert consensus using Delphi methodology from the Spanish Society for Head and Neck Cancer (part 1).

Head and neck cancer is one of the most frequent malignances worldwide. Despite the site-specific multimodality therapy, up to half of the patients will develop recurrence. Treatment selection based on a multidisciplinary tumor board represents the cornerstone of head and neck cancer, as it is essential for achieving the best results, not only in terms of outcome, but also in terms of organ-function preservation and quality of life. Evidence-based international and national clinical practice guidelines for head and neck cancer not always provide answers in terms of decision-making that specialists must deal with in their daily practice. This is the first Expert Consensus on the Multidisciplinary Approach for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC) elaborated by the Spanish Society for Head and Neck Cancer and based on a Delphi methodology. It offers several specific recommendations based on the available evidence and the expertise of our specialists to facilitate decision-making of all health-care specialists involved.

Brain nodules with lung mass: are they always metastases?

In a smoking adult with a lung mass, brain masses are usually diagnosed as brain metastases of lung origin. Nevertheless, differential diagnosis between cerebral abscesses cannot be performed based on clinical symptoms or imaging technologies, and histological diagnosis is essential. This case illustrates the advisability of always obtaining histological diagnosis of the primary tumor and/or cerebral lesion before introducing any oncological treatment (AU)

No disponible

Occipital condyle syndrome secondary to bone metastases from rectal cancer.

Skull-base metastases are very unfrequent. Occipital condyle syndrome (OCS) is usually underdiagnosed. Until now few cases have been reported in the literature. We present a 71-year-old woman with metastatic rectum adenocarcinoma, with right occipital headache and ipsilateral hypoglossal palsy, diagnosed by computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of OCS due to a skull-base metastasis and treated with radiation therapy.

Occipital condyle syndrome secondary to bone metastases from rectal cancer

Skull-base metastases are very unfrequent. Occipital condyle syndrome (OCS) is usually underdiagnosed. Until now few cases have been reported in the literature. We present a 71-year-old woman with metastatic rectum adenocarcinoma, with right occipital headache and ipsilateral hypoglossal palsy, diagnosed by computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of OCS due to a skull-base metastasis and treated with radiation therapy (AU)

Incidence of radiation-induced leukoencephalopathy after whole brain radiotherapy in patients with brain metastases.

INTRODUCTION: Whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) remains a recommended treatment for patients with brain metastases in terms of symptom palliation, especially when extracranial systemic disease is present. The aim of the study was to determine the clinical correlation between pre-existing leukoaraiosis and posterior leukoencephalopathy secondary to WBRT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We retrospectively reviewed the results of WBRT treatment in 44 patients with melanoma brain metastases. The neuroimaging abnormalities of the white matter (T2-weighted MRI) were graded over time. RESULTS: From the 37 evaluable patients the mean age was 53 years old, 23 male and 14 female. Vascular risk factors were present in 22 patients (59.5%). The WBRT total dose was 20 Gy/5fr (n=21) and 30 Gy/10fr (n=16). Leukoaraiosis pre-WBRT was observed in 9/37 patients (24.3%) and leukoencephalopathy post-WBRT in 2/37 (5.4%). Univariate analysis of prognostic factors (sex, age and vascular risk factors) for leukoaraiosis was conducted observing statistically significant differences for patients with age>or=65 years old (p=0.003). Nineteen patients survived more than 3 months. Twelve patients (63.2%) suffered from vascular risk factors. Univariate analysis demonstrated previous leukoaraiosis as a prognostic factor for developing further leukoencephalopathy after WBRT (p=0.015). CONCLUSIONS: Radiation-induced leukoencephalopathy is greater in patients with pre-existing leukoaraiosis. Because of the potential of long-term survival in a small subset of patients with brain metastases and the risk of radiation-induced dementia, neurotoxicity reduction in patients with leukoaraiosis is an important goal of treatment.

Incidence of radiation-induced leukoencephalopathy after whole brain radiotherapy in patients with brain metastases

INTRODUCTION: Whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) remains a recommended treatment for patients with brain metastases in terms of symptom palliation, especially when extracranial systemic disease is present. The aim of the study was to determine the clinical correlation between pre-existing leukoaraiosis and posterior leukoencephalopathy secondary to WBRT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We retrospectively reviewed the results of WBRT treatment in 44 patients with melanoma brain metastases. The neuroimaging abnormalities of the white matter (T2-weighted MRI) were graded over time. RESULTS: From the 37 evaluable patients the mean age was 53 years old, 23 male and 14 female. Vascular risk factors were present in 22 patients (59.5%). The WBRT total dose was 20 Gy/5fr (n=21) and 30 Gy/10fr (n=16). Leukoaraiosis pre-WBRT was observed in 9/37 patients (24.3%) and leukoencephalopathy post-WBRT in 2/37 (5.4%). Univariate analysis of prognostic factors (sex, age and vascular risk factors) for leukoaraiosis was conducted observing statistically significant differences for patients with age>or=65 years old (p=0.003). Nineteen patients survived more than 3 months. Twelve patients (63.2%) suffered from vascular risk factors. Univariate analysis demonstrated previous leukoaraiosis as a prognostic factor for developing further leukoencephalopathy after WBRT (p=0.015). CONCLUSIONS: Radiation-induced leukoencephalopathy is greater in patients with pre-existing leukoaraiosis. Because of the potential of long-term survival in a small subset of patients with brain metastases and the risk of radiation-induced dementia, neurotoxicity reduction in patients with leukoaraiosis is an important goal of treatment (AU)

Clinical outcome in patients with intramedullary spinal cord metastases from lung cancer.

Intramedullary spinal cord metastases (ISCM) are uncommon and present with rapidly progressing neurological deficits. The objective of this study was to determine the rate, duration of neurological response and survival after radiation therapy. We have retrospectively reviewed the clinical outcome of six cases with a diagnosis of ISCM from primary lung cancer, non-small cell (NSCLC) (n=3) and small cell (SCLC) (n=3). Total radiation dose ranged from 27 Gy/5 fr to 40 Gy/20 fr. Ambulation was preserved in 3 patients and partially recovered in one. Five out of the six patients (83%) showed improvement in neurological signs/symptoms with a mean duration of 17.2 days (max: 40 days; min: 6 days). Median survival time was 5 months (confidence interval (CI) 95%: 0-12) for NSCLC and 5 months (CI 95%: 4-6) for SCLC. Although radiation response rate is high, the interval free of neurological progression is very short. A therapeutic approach should be considered for each individual.

Low dose rate brachytherapy in lip carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Lip cancer is frequently treated with surgery although radiation therapy offers comparable results. The aim of the study was to evaluate the local cure rate in patients with lip carcinoma treated with 192-Ir low dose rate interstitial brachytherapy. METHODS: Fifty-four patients with a mean age of 70 years (range, 40-90 years) were retrospectively evaluated. The tumour location was the superior lip in 4 (7.4%) and the inferior lip in 50 (92.6%). Tumour stage was T1N0 in 33 patients and T2N0 in 21 patients. The radioactive sources with hypodermic needles in 49 patients (90.7%) and plastic tubes in 5 (9.3%) were placed parallel and equidistant from one another across the tumour volume according to the Paris system rules. RESULTS: The median dose was 61.5 Gy (range, 60-65 Gy). All patients experienced acute brisk skin and mucositis RTOG grade III around the implanted volume, subsiding within 4-6 weeks after the implant. Local control was achieved in 98% of patients. The mean follow-up was 7 years. CONCLUSIONS: Low dose rate interstitial brachytherapy with 192-Iridium is a well established and efficacious way to achieve local control of the tumour in lip cancer. It offers the advantage of avoiding surgery in an elderly population.

Low dose rate brachytherapy in lip carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Lip cancer is frequently treated with surgery although radiation therapy offers comparable results. The aim of the study was to evaluate the local cure rate in patients with lip carcinoma treated with 192-Ir low dose rate interstitial brachytherapy. METHODS: Fifty-four patients with a mean age of 70 years (range, 40-90 years) were retrospectively evaluated. The tumour location was the superior lip in 4 (7.4%) and the inferior lip in 50 (92.6%). Tumour stage was T1N0 in 33 patients and T2N0 in 21 patients. The radioactive sources with hypodermic needles in 49 patients (90.7%) and plastic tubes in 5 (9.3%) were placed parallel and equidistant from one another across the tumour volume according to the Paris system rules. RESULTS: The median dose was 61.5 Gy (range, 60-65 Gy). All patients experienced acute brisk skin and mucositis RTOG grade III around the implanted volume, subsiding within 4-6 weeks after the implant. Local control was achieved in 98% of patients. The mean follow-up was 7 years. CONCLUSIONS: Low dose rate interstitial brachytherapy with 192-Iridium is a well established and efficacious way to achieve local control of the tumour in lip cancer. It offers the advantage of avoiding surgery in an elderly population (AU)

Clinical outcome in patients with intramedullary spinal cord metastases from lung cancer

Intramedullary spinal cord metastases (ISCM) are uncommon and present with rapidly progressing neurological deficits. The objective of this study was to determine the rate, duration of neurological response and survival after radiation therapy. We have retrospectively reviewed the clinical outcome of six cases with a diagnosis of ISCM from primary lung cancer, non-small cell (NSCLC) (n=3) and small cell (SCLC) (n=3). Total radiation dose ranged from 27 Gy/5 fr to 40 Gy/20 fr. Ambulation was preserved in 3 patients and partially recovered in one. Five out of the six patients (83%) showed improvement in neurological signs/symptoms with a mean duration of 17.2 days (max: 40 days; min: 6 days). Median survival time was 5 months (confidence interval (CI) 95%: 0-12) for NSCLC and 5 months (CI 95%: 4-6) for SCLC. Although radiation response rate is high, the interval free of neurological progression is very short. A therapeutic approach should be considered for each individual (AU)

Clinical outcome after surgical resection of lung metastases from melanoma

BACKGROUND: Surgical therapy plays an important role in the management of selected patients with metastatic melanoma. PURPOSE: A retrospective review of 13 patients who underwent surgical resection of lung metastases from melanoma from 1996 to 2003 was performed. The aim of the study was to analyze the clinical outcome and survival time. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Mean age was 45 years old (range: 31-64). Complete tumour resection was confirmed histologically. Nine patients presented one single pulmonary lesion, two lesions (n = 3) and three lesions (n = 1) but in all cases confined in the same pulmonary lobe. RESULTS: Median survival time (MST) for the entire group was 20 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 16-24 months). The median time to disease progression after lung metastasectomy was 5 months (95% CI: 3-7 months). MST, according to the prognostic groups proposed by the International Registry of Lung Metastases, was 17 months (95% CI: 6-28 months) for group I (n = 6), MST of 20 months (95% CI: 16-24 months) for group II (n = 5) and MST of 4 months for group III (n = 2), without differences statistically significant (log-rank p = 0.423). MST regarding the time of disease free interval from diagnostic of primary tumour and lung metastases (< 36 months [n = 5] vs > 36 months [n = 8]) was 20 months and 17 months respectively, without differences statistically significant (log rank p = 0.222). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical resection when feasible provides survival rates superior to any available nonsurgical therapy. In carefully selected patients, when the resection is performed with curative intent, it may result in improved survival (AU)

La radioterapia en el tratamiento de las metástasis coroideas y cerebrales simultáneas / Radiation therapy in simultaneous choroidal and brain metastases

Las metástasis coroideas de cáncer de pulmón pueden presentarse como primera manifestación clínica de extensión metastásica de la enfermedad aunque suelen coexistir con al menos dos localizaciones metastásicas. La sintomatología más frecuente es la disminución de la agudeza visual. Sin embargo, hasta un 20% de las metástasis cerebrales también pueden presentar alteraciones visuales, por lo que debe realizarse el diagnóstico diferencial entre metástasis cerebral y/o coroidea.Presentamos un caso de una paciente diagnosticada de adenocarcinoma de pulmón que a raíz de una disminución de la agudeza visual fue diagnosticada de metástasis coroideas y cerebrales simultáneas. Fue tratada con irradiación holocraneal (DT 20Gy/5fracciones) con una mejoría significativa de la agudeza visual. Este caso ilustra que aunque la expectancia de vida de los pacientes con cáncer de pulmón metastático es corta, un diagnóstico y tratamiento adecuado puede mejorar la calidad de vida de estos pacientes

Choroidal metastases from lung cancer can be the initial clinical manifestation of metastasic disease, although they generally coexist with at least two more metastasic sites. The most common symptom is decreased vision, however 20% of brain metastases can present with visual alterations. A differential diagnosis within brain metastases and/or choroidal is necessary. We present the case of a patient with lung cancer and decreased vision who was diagnosed as simultaneous choroidal and brain metastases. Radiation therapy (20Gy/5fractions) significantly improves decreased vision. This case shows that, although life expectancy of patients with metastasic lung cancer is short, an adequate diagnosis and treatment, can improve the quality of life of those patients

Toxicidad y tratamiento de soporte en oncología radioterápica; pulmón / No disponible

No disponible

[Radiation therapy in simultaneous choroidal and brain metastases]. / La radioterapia en el tratamiento de las metástasis coroideas y cerebrales simultáneas.

Choroidal metastases from lung cancer can be the initial clinical manifestation of metastasic disease, although they generally coexist with at least two more metastasic sites. The most common symptom is decreased vision, however 20% of brain metastases can present with visual alterations. A differential diagnosis within brain metastases and/or choroidal is necessary. We present the case of a patient with lung cancer and decreased vision who was diagnosed as simultaneous choroidal and brain metastases. Radiation therapy (20Gy/5fractions) significantly improves decreased vision. This case shows that, although life expectancy of patients with metastasic lung cancer is short, an adequate diagnosis and treatment, can improve the quality of life of those patients.